Essay on Multicultural Mosaic

The question of multicultural differences in Canada is heated by complicated political and social situation, national stereotypes and prejudices. These factors create a conflict between the majority and minority pf the population, and have tremendous and unpleasant consequences for many ethic groups. Bissoondath states: “we like to think, in this country [Canada], that our multicultural mosaic will help nudge us in into a greater openness. But multiculturalism as we know it, indulges in stereotype, depends on it for a dash of color and the flash of Dance” (Bissoondath 76).

Help with Essay on Multicultural Mosaic
Help with Essay on Multicultural Mosaic

Formation of Canadian culture was influenced by cultural mix during the creation process, by racial inequalities and by mix of specific worldview of indigenous population and colonizers. All these features have a great influence on cultural peculiarities of Canadian nation and caused specificity of Canadian politics. On the one hand, multicultural mosaic in education opens new opposites to students to study different cultural context and traditions. Following Ramsey and Williams (2002): “the issue of language and the use of bilingual or second language approaches stimulated the emergence of multiculturalism” (37). Also, multicultural ideology is seen as the main driven force of modern world. It is possible to say that Canada has a unique culture which was coined during centuries. Canadian culture is based on national differences and heritage rather than ideals. In concrete terms, the great influx of immigrants and ex-colonials has eroded homogeneous national identities, or rather the traditional, received pedagogical images and narratives of national homogeneity, and has thereby revealed the hybrid nature of politics today.

These factors cause greater openness and have a positive impact on national identity and self-identification. The Canadian nation is best seen as an imagined political community, at once sovereign and spatially finite-imagined, because most of its members will never see or know each other. But once created, this imagined communion of the nation represents a powerful sociological reality as a community imagined to move in linear fashion through empty, homogeneous time.” Canada is witnessing an increase in mixed marriages, in social and residential mobility, and in the opting out of “given” cultures and the creation of “new” social formations” (Burnaby 1998, 23). In this case, the key to understanding politics is an appreciation of those features that differentiate social and political forms and which provide a focus for individual identity and loyalty (Li, 1994).

On the other hand, Bissoondath is right stating that cultural and ethical stereotypes have a negative impact on minority groups and their rights. In general, cultural and national stereotypes generalize the basic features of a particular nationality making them the characteristics of all members of this group. Wrong historical images of ethical minorities are supported by racism popularized by the state through media channels. The main problem faced by minorities is that media does not portray positive and realistic cultural and historical images of Indians and other groups and their traditions. Media does not provide images of people to show a variety of human beings deserving of respect. This is a silent strategy of antagonism which is skillfully used by the state.

In spite of democratization processes and equal rights movement the organization of violence and coercive relations constitutes an additional site of power which interpenetrates with other domains and directly affects life and death chances in and across communities. Concentrated physical force can function on behalf of a community, acting for its preservation or defense, or against it, eroding security and undermining pre-established regulatory mechanisms. Prior to the emergence of the modern state, political authorities often faced rival centers of power backed by organized force. The main problem is that rhe effect of national stereotype shifts the perception of a particular person in the perceptual space. Stereotypes affect perceptions of the other group and have a significant influence on the acceptance of this group by another unity.

Many researchers underline that it is difficult to change wrong social images of racial and national minorities and their status, because ‘the democratic society’ supports sexism and racism. In contrast to these issues, national minorities are also against homogeneous culture and multiculturalism. For instance, “Quebec’s shift toward territorial unilingualism and a culture de convergence was perhaps inevitable given the array of forces ranged against the preservation of a distinctly francophone social order in North America” (Burnaby, Ricento 1998, 17). The same situation is typical for many immigrants who come to Canada and unable to assimilate. For instance, “the world view provided by the Hindu religion indeed facilitates ethnic cultural retention and transmission” (Dhruvarajan 1993, 63).

In Canada, multiculturalism depends on stereotypes “for a dash of colour and the flash of Dance” preventing many people from social equality and respect. For instance, stereotypes of Indians as isolated groups with unique cultural background alienate them from the society creating a negative impact of ‘dissenters’. The Aboriginal people of Canada certainly suffered (and continue to suffer) through the policy of relegating Aboriginal people to lives of official neglect on reserves” (Bellfy 2001, 11). These complex notions are based on an image or general impression allied to a whole group, and determining what this group is like. These issues lead to discrimination and social aversion.

In sum, from this perspective, culture and ethical identity can never be neutral between competing ways of life but must preserve the form of life in which individuals are embedded. It is important because the politics is not prior to social arrangements but constituted by them. A person’s autonomy is not established by a kind of release from social constraints, so that the imaginative self can realize individually-determined ends, but is realized through full participation in the civic order. Canadian government tries to eliminate cultural barriers and ethical differences, but stereotypes have a crucial impact on social image of national minorities and their low position in the Canadian society.

Works Cited Page
1. Bellfy, Ph. “Introduction: Aboriginal Peoples The Changing Face of Canada”. American Review of Canadian Studies. Association for Canadian Studies in the United States. 2001, 11.
2. Burnaby, B., Ricento, Th. Language and Politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and Realities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
3. Dhruvarajan, V. “Ethnic Cultural Retention and Transmission among First Generation Hindu Asian Indians in a Canadian Prairie City”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, University of Calgary, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 1993, 63.
4. Li, P.S. A World Apart: The Multicultural World of Visible Minorities and the Art World of Canada. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Assn. Vol 31, Iss, 4. 1994, 365.
5. Ramsey, P.G., Williams, L.R., Vold, E.B. Multicultural Education: A Sourcebook.
RoutledgeFalmer: New York, 2002. is a provider of high quality, custom writing services and can write any kind of paper, including case studies. is experienced in writing informative, detailed, and concise case studies on any subject and using either kind of case study approaches. If you need help with a case study, place your order for a case study and one of our professional writers will happily construct a case study for you or help you with any other writing assignment you may have: Essay, Research Paper, Thesis, Term Paper, etc.

Place your order now to get an excellent custom-written case study!

Comments are closed.